
Step 1:
Help the person think of the problem in words that refer to self, e.g., ``How is this a problem to me?''
Step 2:
Help the person focus on specific feelings and reactions to the problem.
Step 3:
Help the person to ``own'' specific feelings about the problem.
Step 4:
Help the person explore how thinking, feeling, or action can contribute to the problem. Help the person answer: ``What am I doing that contributes to the problem? Not doing?''
Step 5:
Help the person identify and list specific changes in behavior designed to solve the problem. Brainstorm solutions to the problem. (Leave no idea out of the brainstormed list.)
Step 6:
Help the person answer: ``Of the generated list of behavior changes, which am I most willing to try and/or able to accomplish?''
Step 7:
Help the person commit to adopting the most realistic changes in behavior.
Step 8:
Help the person review the solutions identified (the brainstormed list). Weed out the impossible, consider the rest, and put solution(s) into practice.
Step 9:
Set a date and time to review the behavior changes and solutions. If the problem remains unsolved, adjust the plan as necessary.
Steps for two people in solving a common problem
Step 1: Problem recognition by the two
Step 2: Problem definition by the two
Make a ``How to …'' statement in which the problem appears solvable:
In brainstorming alternatives, follow these rules:
Jointly analyze alternative solutions
Make your joint decision based on:
Blocks to productive problem solving include:
Using reassuring cliches, e.g.:
Reassuring cliches often are given automatically, without thinking. Sometimes they are used as ``fillers'' during embarrassing moments or emotional outbreaks. Saying ``Everything will be all right,'' may reduce your friends' anxiety, but such a response may result from an unrecognized need to reduce your own anxiety—to make yourself feel more comfortable. Reassuring cliches block problem solving because (1) they tend to convey that you feel they are worrying needlessly, (2) that you are not interested in or do not understand their problems. You can reassure your friends by communicating facts of a positive and pertinent nature. Assisting others to clarify their position is important to problem solving.
Giving advice:
By telling your friends what to do, you impose your own values, opinions, and solutions on them rather than helping them explore their ideas and allowing them to arrive at their own conclusions. Even when they clearly ask for advice, you should be cautious in your response. Encourage them to explore and identify their feelings about the situation.
Requesting an explanation:
By requesting an explanation, you ask others to analyze their feelings or actions immediately. You keep them dealing at the cognitive level by asking questions. Although generally questions are useful in determining the nature of the problem, those that ask ``why'' can be intimidating. Such probing may make others feel uneasy, causing them to invent a reply. ``Who,'' ``what,'' ``when,'' and ``where'' questions used in clarifying identities, things and events, times and places will elicit factual information. ``How'' and ``why'' questions demand reasons, causes, and purposes. This is information often difficult or impossible to verbalize.
Agreeing with your friend:
Introducing your own opinions or values into the problem can prevent others from expressing themselves freely. By agreeing with them, you can make it difficult for them to change or modify their opinion later. If they have expressed ideas other than what they actually believe to be true, they (in the heat of the moment,) may be hesitant to retract emotional statements for rational ones.
Giving approval:
Giving approval can sometimes create a block by shifting the focus of the discussion to your values and feelings. Most importantly, you imply what is or what is not acceptable. It is possible that you may approve behavior of which the others actually disapprove—such as crying, expressing strong feelings, or hurling insults.
Expressing disapproval:
When you indicate disapproval of others' feelings or actions, again your own values are imposed on them. Such a negative value judgment may intimidate or anger the others, increasing their feelings of guilt and hopelessness. This effectively halts communication.
Contradicting your friend:
By contradicting your friends you indicate that what they have said is unacceptable. You are setting yourself up as the authority figure. This may be threatening to them and may keep them from expressing themselves further on the subject. It may make them defensive or angry, as you are denying their feelings and their right to be themselves.
Changing the subject:
You can misdirect the course of problem solving by changing the subject. By doing this you are not giving the others' the freedom to discuss what they wish. Having been blocked once, they may abandon further attempts to make their feelings known. You may be changing the subject to avoid dealing with a problem that makes you uncomfortable at a conscious or subconscious level regardless of your friend's needs.
Useful responses in problem solving include:
Exploratory responses:
Exploratory responses to those that encourage friends to stay deeply involved in the problem–solving communication and, at the same time, give them freedom and latitude in their responses. They are encouraged to become active participants in the communication rather than passive receivers of your advice and knowledge. You help them to feel free to reject, disagree, or modify your comments and observations. Your responses encourage them to explore further, to go deeper to expand, to elaborate, and also to assume a great deal of the responsibility for the direction and comfort of the problem– solving process.
Listening responses:
By this response to problem solving, you actively and deliberately communicate to your friends that you are listening and trying to understand. You ask for clarification whenever something is unclear or confusing. Periodically you paraphrase or check with them what you think they have said. These responses offer proof to them that you are really listening and trying to understand. Also, in order for you to test your understanding, you ask them to confirm or deny what you think you have heard. Listening responses communicate that they are being taken seriously. They are encouraged to think carefully about their own statements—to take themselves seriously and to begin listening at least as closely to their own concerns as you have been.
"Affective–Cognitive'' responses:
The word ``affective'' refers to feelings. ``Cognitive'' refers to the content or context of the story line. Affective responses generally are about emotions, feelings, or bodily states, such as fear, anger, tension. These responses attempt to maintain and intensify your friends' focus on the ``feeling'' parts of their problem statements. You use this response mode when you want to encourage them to focus more clearly on underlying attitudes, values, and gut–level reactions to their problems.
Cognitive responses are those related to the ``information'' parts of a persons's statements, usually seeking facts. Cognitive responses shift the interaction to a thinking or analytic mode. Making cognitive responses is a little like listening to the words of a song and ignoring the music.
Honest labeling:
An important part of communication is the feelings people have about each other as they converse. Labeling these here– and–now feelings often requires a great deal of courage. Frequently, the only time you offer others honest feedback in the course of your daily communication is in a fit of anger. Often you may choose to respond in a vague, less than completely honest or specific way because you think others are unable to deal directly with their more troublesome concerns. When you choose not to be honest, you do so out of your own concern and desire to save face. Often the others assume that you are unwilling to engage in or to assist them in problem solving.
Problem Solving Role–Play Activity
Now that you have reviewed the elements of problem solving, it's time to practice. Read the following ten role–play situations. You and a friend assume the roles in each play. Spend a minimum of ten minutes in each role. Record the jointly agreed–upon solution for each role play situation. Use this role–play activity to rehearse the listening and responding skills you have learned.
Ten Role–Play Situations for Effective Problem Solving
With kind Permision
James J. Messina, Ph.D., & Constance M. Messina, Ph.D.Copin www.coping.org
Our Other Sites
All Things Spiritual